BasedBot vs GMGN

BasedBot leads on 2 of 5 shared benchmarks, GMGN on 3. BasedBot wins on Memecoin trading fees (0.57% vs 0.80%), Average swap size on Solana ($148.91 vs $137.05). GMGN wins on Trading platform leaderboard ($124.30M vs $14.26M), Unique daily swap transactions on Solana (907.0K vs 95.8K), Daily active wallets per trading platform (39.3K vs 12.4K).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
GMGN logo
GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Side by side measurements

Trading platform leaderboard: GMGN vs Axiom vs Fomo vs pump.fun, live 24h volume

Trading

BasedBot

Trails

$14.26M

p99
$14.26M
rank
#4
samples
14,263,900

GMGN

Leads

$124.30M

p99
$124.30M
rank
#1
samples
124,296,000

Volume figures are sourced from Dune community datasets, which aggregate cross-chain trading activity per platform (Solana, BNB Chain, Base, Robinhood node, HyperEVM, Monad, and more). Data is refreshed every 4 hours. pump.fun volume = bonding-curve Solana swaps (dataset_pumpapp_sol_daily) + cross-chain relay swaps (dataset_pumpfun_relay_daily). Fomo = Solana only (dataset_fomo_sol_daily). All others sum across all blockchains.

Solana memecoin platform fee rates: Axiom vs Fomo vs pump.fun vs GMGN vs Trojan, live 24h

Trading

BasedBot

Leads

0.57 %

p99
0.57%
rank
#1
samples
80,877

GMGN

Trails

0.80 %

p99
0.80%
rank
#2
samples
994,990

Take rate = fees / volume * 100. Fees are on-chain inflows to known fee wallets (Dune query 8316589, refreshed every 6h). Fomo fees come from DeFiLlama (on-chain USDC + off-chain relay). Volume is total Mobula-attributed volume; the take rate is a lower bound since platforms with variable or waivable fees will show lower observed rates.

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

BasedBot

Leads

$148.91

p99
$148.91
rank
#1
samples
95,788

GMGN

Trails

$137.05

p99
$137.05
rank
#2
samples
906,976

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Unique daily swap transactions on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom vs Trojan, live

Trading

BasedBot

Trails

95.8K

p99
95.8K
rank
#6
samples
95,788

GMGN

Leads

907.0K

p99
907.0K
rank
#2
samples
906,976

Counts unique tx_ids per platform, not unique wallets. Actual unique-wallet count is 3-10x lower since active traders execute multiple transactions per day. Includes bots, MEV searchers, and multi-wallet traders. Terminals (GMGN, Axiom, Fomo, Trojan, Photon, Maestro) use fee wallet inflow detection; pump.fun uses Dune Spellbook (dex_solana.trades, project IN pumpdotfun/pumpswap) to avoid noise from fee-wallet micro-inflows at 0% fee.

Rolling 24h · Unique swap tx 24hRaw JSON

Daily active wallets per trading platform: GMGN vs Axiom vs Fomo vs pump.fun, live

Trading

BasedBot

Trails

12.4K

p99
12.4K
rank
#5
samples
12,449

GMGN

Leads

39.3K

p99
39.3K
rank
#3
samples
39,285

Wallet counts are unique wallets per platform per day from Dune community datasets (cross-chain). A wallet using two platforms is counted in each; counts are not mutually exclusive. Includes bots, MEV searchers, and multi-wallet traders. pump.fun wallets come from dataset_pumpapp_sol_daily only (not relay); relay wallets would overlap with pumpapp and double-count. Data represents the most recent complete day, refreshed every 4 hours.

Rolling 24h · Active wallets 24hRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

BasedBot vs GMGN: which one is better?

BasedBot and GMGN are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BasedBot leads on Memecoin trading fees. GMGN leads on Trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, BasedBot or GMGN?

On the Solana memecoin platform fee rates benchmark, BasedBot leads at 0.57% versus GMGN at 0.80%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, BasedBot or GMGN?

On the Trading platform leaderboard benchmark, GMGN leads at $124.30M versus BasedBot at $14.26M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BasedBot vs GMGN comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.