Binance vs Hyperliquid

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:37:55 UTCWindow: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks

Binance

Official BNB Chain RPC endpoints operated by Binance. Multiple dataseed hosts (`bsc-dataseed1.binance.org` etc.) round-robin for load distribution.

Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Binance

Leads

1.65 bps

p99: 2.66 bps
rank: #3
samples: 3

Hyperliquid

Trails

2.20 bps

p99: 2.94 bps
rank: #4
samples: 3

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Binance

Leads

0.0055 %

p99: 0.0052%
rank: #6
samples: 2,878

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.011 %

p99: 0.0032%
rank: #9
samples: 2,878

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.