edgeX vs Hyperliquid

edgeX leads on 5 of 9 shared benchmarks, Hyperliquid on 4. edgeX wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.043% vs 0.047%), Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (3.00 bps vs 3.58 bps), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.120x vs 1.178x), Perp DEX capital efficiency (3 vs 0.023). Hyperliquid wins on Perp DEX execution quality (0.0033% vs 0.0054%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (178 vs 176), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.631x vs 2.67x), Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live (82.7 bps vs 90.0 bps). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks
edgeX logo
edgeX

StarkEx-settled perp DEX with low taker fees and a documented public REST API.

Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

edgeX

Leads

3.00 bps

p99
3.00 bps
rank
#13
samples
1,862

Hyperliquid

Trails

3.58 bps

p99
3.25 bps
rank
#16
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
edgeXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

edgeX

Leads

3

p99
3
rank
#8
samples
2,876

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.023

p99
0.023
rank
#12
samples
2,876
Markets per $M TVL
edgeXn/aHyperliquidn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
edgeX3.23x9.22x4.46x$5.05M$3.65M35.0%$617.41M0.100x
Hyperliquid22.3x95.6x28.6x$76.13M$59.33M23.3%$9.06B0.102x
View
edgeXn/aHyperliquidn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

edgeX

Trails

2.67x

p99
2.95x
rank
#15
samples
2,805

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.631x

p99
0.768x
rank
#5
samples
2,876
Volume / OI (24h)
edgeXn/aHyperliquidn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

edgeX

Trails

90.0 bps

rank
samples
14provisional

Hyperliquid

Leads

82.7 bps

p99
57.6 bps
rank
#11
samples
658
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
edgeXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 24h · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

edgeX vs Hyperliquid: which one is better?

edgeX and Hyperliquid are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. edgeX leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Hyperliquid leads on Perp DEX execution quality. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, edgeX or Hyperliquid?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, edgeX leads at 0.043% versus Hyperliquid at 0.047%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on slippage at $100k, edgeX or Hyperliquid?

On the Perp DEX execution quality benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 0.0033% versus edgeX at 0.0054%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the edgeX vs Hyperliquid comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.