Extended vs Hyperliquid

Extended leads on 3 of 11 shared benchmarks, Hyperliquid on 8. Extended wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.028% vs 0.048%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (339 vs 179), Perp DEX capital efficiency (3 vs 0.020). Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.57 bps vs 3.21 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($8.57B vs $528.95M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0045% vs 0.0053%), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.204x vs 1.973x). Data as of 2026-11-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h12 shared benchmarks, 11 measured on both sides
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Hyperliquid

$1.65B vs $45.14B

30d lead

Hyperliquid

$7.18B vs $172.04B

Days led, last 30

0 / 30

Extended / Hyperliquid

Current streak

90 days

Hyperliquid since Aug 8, 2026

ExtendedHyperliquid

UTC days, one side per trade

05B10B15B20BAug 8Nov 5lead

Extended volume ÷ Hyperliquid volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

3.7% · week to 5 Nov · median 4.5%

Extended ÷ Hyperliquid, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%50%100%median 4%23 Jul6 Aug20 Aug3 Sep17 Sep1 Oct15 Oct29 Oct5 Nov

30 Oct to 5 Nov

Extended ÷ Hyperliquid3.7%
vs median-0.8pt
= Extended volume$1.65B
÷ Hyperliquid volume$45.14B
WindowExtendedHyperliquidExtended / Hyperliquid
Last closed day (Nov 5, 2026)$284M$9.31B3%
Last 7 days$1.65B$45.14B4%
Last 30 days$7.18B$172.04B4%

Sources: Extended, Extended exchange/stats/trading per day, Starknet (Ethereum deployment until 2025-12-29), both sides halved. Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid info candleSnapshot 1h over the main dex, base volume x hourly mean price; matches the exchange's own dayNtlVlm, HIP-3 dexs published as a separate row. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Nov 5, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Extended

Trails

3.21 bps

p99
3.04 bps
rank
#16
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Leads

2.57 bps

p99
1.29 bps
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Extended

Trails

138

p99
138
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Leads

160

p99
160
rank
#1
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Extended

Leads

3

p99
3
rank
#6
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.020

p99
0.020
rank
#12
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFees 30dOpen interestFees / OI
Extended$1.58M$72.16M0.267x
Hyperliquid$88.82M$7.76B0.139x
View
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Extended$284.15M$7.18B1.79%
Hyperliquid$9.31B$172.04B43.0%
View
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Last closed day · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

3.48x

p99
3.80x
rank
#14
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.813x

p99
0.895x
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

64.2 bps

p99
79.7 bps
rank
#18
samples
717

Hyperliquid

Leads

54.0 bps

p99
60.1 bps
rank
#15
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Extendedn/aHyperliquidn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs Hyperliquid: which one is better?

Extended and Hyperliquid are compared on 12 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, Extended or Hyperliquid?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Extended leads at 0.028% versus Hyperliquid at 0.048%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on funding cost to hold a long 24h, Extended or Hyperliquid?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 2.57 bps versus Extended at 3.21 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs Hyperliquid comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.