Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked
TradingGate
Leads0.0041 %
- p99
- 0.0083%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 5,760
Hyperliquid
Trails0.013 %
- p99
- 0.0050%
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 2,880
Gate vs Hyperliquid
Gate leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Hyperliquid on 0. Gate wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0041% vs 0.013%).
Hyperliquid
Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Gate vs Hyperliquid: which one is better?
Gate and Hyperliquid are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gate leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on perp dex funding stability, 24h stddev of eth funding ranked, Gate or Hyperliquid?
On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Gate leads at 0.0041% versus Hyperliquid at 0.013%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Gate vs Hyperliquid comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.