GMGN vs Padre

GMGN leads on both live benchmarks. GMGN wins on Solana trading platform leaderboard ($113.51M vs $16.04M), Average swap size on Solana ($85.14 vs $52.45).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
GMGN logo
GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Side by side measurements

Solana trading platform leaderboard: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Axiom vs Fomo, live 24h volume

Trading

GMGN

Leads

$113.51M

p99
$113.51M
rank
#2
samples
1,402,660

Padre

Trails

$16.04M

p99
$16.04M
rank
#6
samples
315,347

Volume figures are sourced from Mobula's lighthouse aggregator, which indexes on-chain swap events attributed to each trading platform or Telegram bot. Data is refreshed every 15 minutes. Platforms with zero volume may indicate no attributable on-chain activity in the last 24 hours or a temporary attribution gap in Mobula's indexing.

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

GMGN

Leads

$85.14

p99
$85.14
rank
#2
samples
1,333,220

Padre

Trails

$52.45

p99
$52.45
rank
#7
samples
305,913

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Frequently asked questions

GMGN vs Padre: which one is better?

GMGN and Padre are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMGN leads on Solana trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, GMGN or Padre?

On the Solana trading platform leaderboard benchmark, GMGN leads at $113.51M versus Padre at $16.04M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GMGN vs Padre comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.