Hyperliquid vs Jupiter Perps

Split decision: Hyperliquid leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($3.68B vs $103.42M) and Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (178 vs 3); Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 (30.6x vs 102.4x) and Perp DEX price to fees (5.14x vs 19.4x). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Jupiter Perps logo
Jupiter Perps

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Lighter, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

102.4x

p99
102.4x
rank
#9
samples
2,880

Jupiter Perps

Leads

30.6x

p99
30.6x
rank
#4
samples
2,880
P/E ratio
Hyperliquidn/aJupiter Perpsn/a

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Hyperliquid19.4x83.4x23.8x$87.53M$71.31M23.3%$8.56B0.124x
Jupiter Perps5.14x10.6x14.8x$18.05M$6.27M48.4%$47.30M4.64x
View
Hyperliquidn/aJupiter Perpsn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.278x

p99
0.434x
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Jupiter Perps

Trails

1.033x

p99
1.408x
rank
#12
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Hyperliquidn/aJupiter Perpsn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Price to fees across DeFi: what the market pays per dollar of protocol fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratiovs categoryFees MoMToken 30dFloatFDV / feesMarket capFees 30dRevenue 30dP/STVLSupply 30dSupply 90d
Hyperliquid19.4x2.17x3.43%8.88%23.3%83.5x$20.70B$87.53M$71.31M23.9x$7.53B--
Jupiter Perps5.13x0.574x-51.8%48.4%10.6x$1.13B$18.05M$6.27M14.8x$2.85B0.012%0.012%
View
Hyperliquidn/aJupiter Perpsn/a

A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the monthly fee trend, then do your own work.

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Jupiter Perps: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Jupiter Perps are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Hyperliquid or Jupiter Perps?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at $3.68B versus Jupiter Perps at $103.42M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the lower p/e ratio, Hyperliquid or Jupiter Perps?

On the Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at 30.6x versus Hyperliquid at 102.4x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Jupiter Perps comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.