Hyperliquid vs Lighter RH

Hyperliquid leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks, Lighter RH on 2. Hyperliquid wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($3.80B vs $533.89M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (179 vs 71), Perp DEX asset breadth (160 vs 46), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.368x vs 2.96x). Lighter RH wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.87 bps vs 3.00 bps), Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live (40.3 bps vs 55.8 bps). Data as of 2026-11-07 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Lighter RH logo
Lighter RH

Lighter's Robinhood deployment: the same zk order-book engine as Lighter mainnet on a separate host (api.rh.lighter.xyz) with its own books, listing US equities next to crypto perps.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

3.00 bps

p99
-0.67 bps
rank
#12
samples
2,880

Lighter RH

Leads

2.87 bps

p99
2.33 bps
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Hyperliquidn/aLighter RHn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

160

p99
160
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Lighter RH

Trails

46

p99
46
rank
#11
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Hyperliquidn/aLighter RHn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.368x

p99
0.590x
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Lighter RH

Trails

2.96x

p99
3.57x
rank
#16
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Hyperliquidn/aLighter RHn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

55.8 bps

p99
57.1 bps
rank
#15
samples
720

Lighter RH

Leads

40.3 bps

p99
45.4 bps
rank
#8
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Hyperliquidn/aLighter RHn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Lighter RH: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Lighter RH are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Lighter RH leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Hyperliquid or Lighter RH?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at $3.80B versus Lighter RH at $533.89M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Hyperliquid or Lighter RH?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Lighter RH leads at 2.87 bps versus Hyperliquid at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Lighter RH comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.