Hyperliquid vs Ondo Perps

Hyperliquid leads on 7 of 8 shared benchmarks, Ondo Perps on 1. Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.58 bps vs 3.00 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($8.71B vs $492.32M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0045% vs 0.084%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (179 vs 76). Ondo Perps wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.042% vs 0.048%). Data as of 2026-11-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks, 8 measured on both sides
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Ondo Perps logo
Ondo Perps

Ondo Perps is Ondo Finance's perpetuals exchange (live since June 2026): an off-chain matching engine running in Intel SGX enclaves with on-chain custody on Ethereum and Arbitrum, USDC and Ondo tokenized stocks as collateral, and 60+ markets across US equities, ETFs, commodities, indices, FX and crypto.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

2.58 bps

p99
1.30 bps
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Ondo Perps

Trails

3.00 bps

p99
3.00 bps
rank
#14
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Hyperliquidn/aOndo Perpsn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.013 %

p99
0.024%
rank
#9
samples
2,880

Ondo Perps

No data in window

24h ETH funding stddev
Hyperliquidn/aOndo Perpsn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

160

p99
160
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Ondo Perps

Trails

64

p99
64
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Hyperliquidn/aOndo Perpsn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.817x

p99
1.009x
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Ondo Perps

Trails

5.58x

p99
6.43x
rank
#18
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Hyperliquidn/aOndo Perpsn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

54.0 bps

p99
60.4 bps
rank
#15
samples
720

Ondo Perps

Trails

54.8 bps

p99
75.1 bps
rank
#16
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Hyperliquidn/aOndo Perpsn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Ondo Perps: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Ondo Perps are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Ondo Perps leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on funding cost to hold a long 24h, Hyperliquid or Ondo Perps?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 2.58 bps versus Ondo Perps at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, Hyperliquid or Ondo Perps?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Ondo Perps leads at 0.042% versus Hyperliquid at 0.048%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Ondo Perps comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.