Hyperliquid vs Paradex

Hyperliquid leads on 4 of 7 shared benchmarks, Paradex on 3. Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.19 bps vs 2.08 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($3.19B vs $5.89M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (177 vs 62), Perp DEX mark price fidelity: deviation from CEX spot reference, live (0.044% vs 0.062%). Paradex wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.035% vs 0.046%), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0038% vs 0.014%), Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live (1,039 vs 1,008).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Paradex: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Paradex are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Paradex leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized, Hyperliquid or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 1.19 bps versus Paradex at 2.08 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on cheapest perp dex, live all-in cost from $1k to $1m on eth, btc and sol, Hyperliquid or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.035% versus Hyperliquid at 0.046%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.