Hyperliquid vs Polymarket

Hyperliquid leads on 6 of 8 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 2. Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.37 bps vs 3.00 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($4.25B vs $58.85M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0035% vs 0.018%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (178 vs 89). Polymarket wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.044% vs 0.047%), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.00010% vs 0.014%). Data as of 2026-10-24 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h8 shared benchmarks
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Polymarket logo
Polymarket

The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading
ProviderFunding cost to hold a long 24hAnnualized (ETH)Per-hour rate (ETH)BTC hold 24hSOL hold 24h
Hyperliquid1.37 bps4.62%0.05 bps3.00 bps-
Polymarket3.00 bps10.9%0.13 bps3.00 bps3.00 bps
View
Hyperliquidn/aPolymarketn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.014 %

p99
0.018%
rank
#13
samples
2,880

Polymarket

Leads

0.00010 %

p99
0%
rank
#1
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Hyperliquidn/aPolymarketn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.371x

p99
0.439x
rank
#4
samples
2,880

Polymarket

Trails

0.551x

p99
0.586x
rank
#6
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Hyperliquidn/aPolymarketn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

66.9 bps

p99
57.6 bps
rank
#17
samples
702

Polymarket

Trails

89.3 bps

p99
45.9 bps
rank
#21
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Hyperliquidn/aPolymarketn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Polymarket: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Polymarket are compared on 8 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Polymarket leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on funding cost to hold a long 24h, Hyperliquid or Polymarket?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 1.37 bps versus Polymarket at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, Hyperliquid or Polymarket?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Polymarket leads at 0.044% versus Hyperliquid at 0.047%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Polymarket comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.