Hyperliquid vs Starknet

Hyperliquid leads on both live benchmarks. Hyperliquid wins on Bridged TVL by chain ($7.14B vs $384.75M), Stablecoin flow by chain ($449.51M vs $2.26M). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Side by side measurements

Bridged TVL by chain: how much of a chain's capital came from somewhere else

Blockchains
ProviderBridged TVLBridged share7d change7d vs peersNativeCanonicalExternal
Hyperliquid$7.14B100.0%---$7.14B-
Starknet$384.75M72.9%18.2%16.1%$142.87M$299.56M$85.19M
View
Hyperliquidn/aStarknetn/a

Bridged TVL is value secured by the chain's bridge, not value locked in its DeFi protocols; a chain can rank high on one and low on the other. The split is L2Beat's: canonical is escrowed on the host chain by the chain's own contracts, external came through a third-party bridge, native was minted here. Rows are the chains L2Beat tracks in its scaling summary; a settled L1 has no row by construction, not by omission. Size is not quality: a large balance says capital came, not that it stayed.

Stablecoin flow by chain: where dollars actually moved over 30 days

Blockchains
ProviderNet stablecoin flow (30d)30d changeStablecoin floatNet 7d7d change
Hyperliquid$449.51M6.44%$7.43B--
Starknet$2.26M1.51%$151.63M$4.21M2.85%
View
Hyperliquidn/aStarknetn/a

Stablecoin float is where dollars are parked, not what they do. A chain can take in a billion that sits idle, and lose float to a single issuer redeeming. The figure is DefiLlama's chain-wide pegged-USD aggregate, every issuer combined; it does not separate a bridge inflow from a native mint, and a dollar bridged to an L2 counts on both chains, so rows are not additive. Read the net dollars with the percentage beside them: the same $400M is a rounding error on Ethereum and a doubling elsewhere.

Rolling 24h · Net stablecoin flow (30d)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Starknet: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Starknet are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Bridged TVL by chain. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher bridged tvl, Hyperliquid or Starknet?

On the Bridged TVL by chain benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at $7.14B versus Starknet at $384.75M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Starknet comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.