FOMO vs Photon

FOMO leads on all 5 live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Solana trading platform leaderboard ($46.78M vs $3.16M), Memecoin trading fees (0.89% vs 1.36%), Solana DEX volume ($39.73M vs $1.81M), Average swap size on Solana ($77.45 vs $73.09).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
FOMO logo
FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Photon logo
Photon

Photon is a Solana trading terminal targeting advanced traders with fast token sniping, smart-money wallet tracking, and direct DEX routing. It charges a per-trade platform fee on swap volume.

Side by side measurements

Solana trading platform leaderboard: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Axiom vs Fomo, live 24h volume

Trading

FOMO

Leads

$46.78M

p99
$46.78M
rank
#4
samples
375,164

Photon

Trails

$3.16M

p99
$3.16M
rank
#7
samples
48,605

Volume figures are sourced from Mobula's lighthouse aggregator, which indexes on-chain swap events attributed to each trading platform or Telegram bot. Data is refreshed every 15 minutes. Platforms with zero volume may indicate no attributable on-chain activity in the last 24 hours or a temporary attribution gap in Mobula's indexing.

Explicit platform fees for trading memecoins (pump.fun vs Fomo vs Photon vs bots)

Trading
ProviderMedian feeTrade count (24h)
FOMOprovisional0.89%3
Photonprovisional1.36%1

Take rate = fees / volume * 100. Fees are on-chain inflows to known fee wallets (Dune query 8316589, refreshed every 6h). Fomo fees come from DeFiLlama (on-chain USDC + off-chain relay). Volume is total Mobula-attributed volume; the take rate is a lower bound since platforms with variable or waivable fees will show lower observed rates.

Solana DEX volume: pump.fun vs Axiom vs GMGN vs Fomo, live 24h

Trading
Provider24h volumeProtocol revenue (24h)7-day volumeTake rate
FOMO$39.73M$375.2K$272.61M0.0094%
Photon$1.81M$27.8K$11.66M0.015%

Volume and revenue data sourced from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs. DeFiLlama attributes volume via on-chain referral tags and program IDs; platforms without standard tags may be undercounted. Figures are 24-hour and 7-day rolling totals updated every 30 minutes. Revenue uses DeFiLlama's dailyRevenue dataType, stripping LP fees. Terminal volume (Axiom, GMGN, Fomo) and launchpad volume (pump.fun) use different attribution methods and are not directly additive.

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

FOMO

Leads

$77.45

p99
$77.45
rank
#4
samples
603,993

Photon

Trails

$73.09

p99
$73.09
rank
#5
samples
43,192

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Unique daily swap transactions on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom vs Trojan, live

Trading

FOMO

Leads

522.3K

p99
522.3K
rank
#3
samples
522,258

Photon

Trails

41.5K

p99
41.5K
rank
#6
samples
41,477

Counts unique tx_ids per platform, not unique wallets. Actual unique-wallet count is 3-10x lower since active traders execute multiple transactions per day. Includes bots, MEV searchers, and multi-wallet traders. Terminals (GMGN, Axiom, Fomo, Trojan, Photon, Maestro) use fee wallet inflow detection; pump.fun uses Dune Spellbook (dex_solana.trades, project IN pumpdotfun/pumpswap) to avoid noise from fee-wallet micro-inflows at 0% fee.

Rolling 24h · Unique swap tx 24hRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs Photon: which one is better?

FOMO and Photon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Solana trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, FOMO or Photon?

On the Solana trading platform leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $46.78M versus Photon at $3.16M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs Photon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.