FOMO vs Trojan

FOMO leads on all 4 live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Trading platform leaderboard ($103.95M vs $4.79M), Solana DEX volume ($165.18M vs $4.79M), Trading app daily volume 2026 ($209.66M vs $4.79M), Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (337 bps vs 440 bps). Data as of 2026-09-27 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
FOMO logo
FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Trojan logo
Trojan

Trojan is a Telegram trading bot for Solana memecoins. It provides fast sniping, copy trading, limit orders and MEV protection, charging a 0.9% fee per trade routed through pump.fun and Raydium pools.

Side by side measurements

Trading platform leaderboard: what GMGN, Axiom, FOMO and Terminal route and what they charge

Trading

FOMO

Leads

$103.95M

p99
$103.95M
rank
#2
samples
103,950,000

Trojan

Trails

$4.79M

p99
$4.79M
rank
#5
samples
4,793,660
24h volume
FOMOn/aTrojann/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama dexs adapter attributes to it per UTC day, over every chain that adapter covers. Commission is the app's own cut from its fees adapter (dailyRevenue), not the total fees paid on the trade: the venue underneath takes its own share, and counting that would roughly double the figure. The take rate divides the two over the same days, so it is a floor where an adapter covers fewer chains for fees than for volume. Rows end on each app's own latest closed day.

Solana DEX volume: pump.fun vs Axiom vs GMGN vs Fomo, live 24h

Trading
Provider24h volumeProtocol revenue (24h)7-day volume
FOMO$165.18M$680.3K$1.01B
Trojan$4.79M$37.8K$27.50M
View
FOMOn/aTrojann/a

Volume and revenue from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs, 24h and 7d totals refreshed every 30 minutes. Terminal volume is a floor: a swap counts only when its transaction pays the terminal's fee wallet and Dune decodes the venue. Revenue (dailyRevenue, LP fees stripped) counts every fee reaching those wallets. Their ratio is a take rate this bench does not rank on: it moves threefold across a fortnight for one app. Bench 201 publishes it daily. Terminal and launchpad volume are not additive.

Trading app daily volume 2026: GMGN, Axiom, FOMO, Terminal, Photon, Trojan by UTC day, every chain

Trading
ProviderDaily volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
FOMO$209.66M$7.75B42.5%
Trojan$4.79M$103.04M0.57%
View
FOMOn/aTrojann/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading
ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
FOMO337 bps129 bps25.6 bps59.0 bps7.49%
Trojan440 bps97.7 bps85.9 bps36.6 bps2.53%
View
FOMOn/aTrojann/a

Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs Trojan: which one is better?

FOMO and Trojan are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h volume, FOMO or Trojan?

On the Trading platform leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $103.95M versus Trojan at $4.79M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs Trojan comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.